Assessment of the Consenting Process Obtained for Neurosurgical Interventions

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Forensic Medicine and Clinical Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

2 Neurosurgery Department, Ain Shams University Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.

Abstract

Abstract
Background: Informed consent for surgical procedures is a vital part of surgical practice, surgeons cannot practice their trade without valid informed consent. Aim & Objective: The present study aimed to assess the current status of the medical consenting process for neurosurgical interventions. Methods: A total number of 200 files of patients who underwent neurosurgical intervention in the neurosurgery department at our institution were included in the study and divided equally into two groups; 100 files of patients operated upon on an elective basis and 100 files of patients operated upon on an emergency basis. Assessment of the consenting process in each case was evaluated according to a designated checklist. The acquired data was statistically analyzed. Results: In the present study, there were no considerable differences between the consent forms for the patients undergoing elective and emergency surgeries. Overall, the consent process in both groups of surgeries was of adequate quality. Conclusions: The existing consent process performed reasonably well in adherence to general standards. While overall adherence to standards was satisfactory, there is an opportunity to enhance patient-centered care by expanding discussions regarding alternative options and their risks. Providing patients with detailed information about the potential outcomes of various treatment options, including the option of no treatment, can empower them to make more informed and personalized decisions about their health.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics